Pattullo has written that a very substantial number of people are born with the potential to live either straight or gay lives. Marriage is not a religious institution but an institution that is governed by the state.
Bennett also makes the gross assumption that heterosexual parents and relationships are superior to those of homosexuals. It appears that one logical fallacy breeds another, as in the very next paragraph, Bennett commits what strikes me as a glaring over-generalization. However, this is merely Just his opinion.
But, overtime, the rules of marriage have bent to allow those of different races and religions to wed. We have gone from a time where blacks and whites were separated in schools, and women were not allowed to vote, to a time where our president is black, and we have female politicians held at high esteem.
The marriage commitment between a man and a woman does not it cannot countenance extramarital outlets. If it was not for adjusting or changing the tradition of marriage, Bennett would not be a owe the very version to marriage that en is so adamant about today.
Nor is this view arbitrary or idiosyncratic. By definition it is not an open contract; its essential idea is fidelity. It is not a step we ought to take. Over the past years, America has forgone the greatest social revolution in modern history.
In our time, there are more not fewer reasons than ever to preserve the essence of marriage. The traditional marriage arrangement that we have grown accustomed to today has not always been the status quo.
A remarkable article in The Post supports this point. He gives no reason why he believes that marriage is our most important institution, nor does he fully explain how it would be the most radical step in deconstruction of society.
Marriage traditions vary greatly by time and culture, and have been constantly redefined in order to adjust to socioeconomic changes amongst society. Societal indifference about heterosexuality and homosexuality would cause a lot of confusion. BENNETT The institution of marriage is already reeling because of the effects of the sexual revolution, no-fault divorce and out-of-wedlock births.
There are other arguments to consider against same-sex marriage for example, the signals it would send, and the impact of such signals on the shaping of human sexuality, particularly among the young.
But it is an argument for making distinctions in law about relationships that are themselves distinct. However, he fails to do so, and this hypothetical question regarding incest, greatly damages the validity behind his argument. In order to legally marry there is not a requirement for a religious ceremony to be held.
How to cite this page Choose cite format: Bennett views marriage as a religious institution, and believes that it is not for society to tamper with. He argues that his view is one of popular belief, and NAS been practiced and taught by every major religion, so it should not be questioned.A Critique of William J.
Bennett’s “Against Gay Marriage” Essay Sample. William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article “Against Gay Marriage.”. Gay Marriage: Not a Very Good Idea WILLIAM J. BENNETT There are other arguments to consider against same-sex marriage for example, the signals it would send, and the impact of such signals on the shaping of human sexuality, particularly among the young.
Best-sellers. He has written and edited a total of 16 books, including What. An Exchange on Same-Sex Marriage William Bennett and Andrew Sullivan Let Gays Marry Andrew Sullivan. A state cannot deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws," declared the Supreme Court last week.
De’Ja Davis 16 September W R8 Ms. Masur A Critique of William J. Bennett’s “Against Gay Marriage” In the article, “Against Gay Marriage,” William J. Bennett declares that the standard for marriage will be destroyed if gays are able to married.
ASSUMPTIONS, NOT FACT A Critique of William J. Bennett’s “Against Gay Marriage” It has become apparent that the issue of gay marriage has been a popular debate in our society, though lately its been receiving more attention.
The gay community’s quest to gain these aforementioned privileges is currently being obstructed by conservative pundits who believe that the love between a man and another man, or a woman and another woman, is not adequate enough to be legally recognized, although heterosexual marriage Is.
William J. Bennett, former Secretary of Education .Download