We learn a lot of things about Frank in Scene 1, his personal relationship, his class and his drinking problems. He effectively builds his argument by using a personal anecdote, allusions to art and history, and rhetorical questions. This response demonstrates limited cohesion and skill in the use and control of language.
It is an active image: This type of insightful analysis is evident throughout the response and indicates advanced analytical skill. The response is cohesive and demonstrates highly effective use and command of language.
In a series of quick exchanges, Horatio is show to be a brave, in talking to the ghost; a leader amongst his comrades, in taking charge of them and deciding on the best course of action; and loyal to Hamlet, in his immediate impulse to tell him of the phantom. Shakespeare accepts that removing just one moment from a long and a convoluted string of events can vastly alter the end result.
The scene for the rest of the play? Light can be acceptable, but too much of it can prove worse than permanent darkness.
I think that this topic Bogard uses appeals to emotion to many different religious groups. He notes that there are a variety of nocturnal and crepuscular species of birds, fish, mammals, insects, and reptiles worldwide.
Act 2 on the other hand, is more about Frank, and the problem with his drinking habits, followed by his banishment to Australia for two years.
This response demonstrates thorough comprehension of the source text through skillful use of paraphrases and direct quotations. He first makes the obvious claim that darkness is essential for sleep.
Willy Russell uses the door metaphorically to explain how hard and painful it is for Rita to get an Education now, and also, all the decisions she is going to take, such as leaving Denny. The writer captures the central idea of the source passage the importance of allowing more darkness to fill the earth for distinct health and ecological reasons and accurately quotes and paraphrases many important details from the passage.
Although the writing in this response is proficient, it does not demonstrate the sentence variety, precise word choice, or highly effective progression of ideas that is expected at the advanced level.
Then, he talks about the negative health effects of sleep disorders. Frank, in scene 2, keeps looking at his watch. Finally, Bogard makes subtle yet efficient use of rhetorical questioning to persuade his audience that natural darkness preservation is essential.
On the whole, this essay displays only a partial understanding of the source text. Bogard builds his arguement in a few different ways.
This writer demonstrates some comprehension of the passage. We also learn a lot from the room, the fact that the room is full books shows all the knowledge that she is seeking to study but also how difficult this task will be for her.
While the first scene does not involve the central characters, it manages to begin the narrative arc of the play immediately. If his audience can relate or even understand his story they will be more willing to agree with him.
Additionally Bogard says that the night sky has inspired countless numbers of philosophers, artists, and stargazers for millennia. Instead, the writer merely cites two sentences from the passage, and offers a brief restatement of each point.
Rita changes a lot throughout the play, at the beginning, she is nervous, uneducated and not confident enough, by the end of the play, she has matured and is able to make wise and informed decisions.
For example, in the first paragraph, the writer claims that One of the senses Bogard uses within his essay is touch, but none of the ensuing discussion relates to touch at all.
The writer also sees the connection between darkness as a source of solitude and it inspiring countless numbers of philosophers, artists, and stargazers for millennia.
She inspects everything around the room, she wants to know everything. The writer also demonstrates a clear progression of ideas both within paragraphs and throughout the essay. Overall, sentences are clear and the writer generally observes the conventions of standard written English.
He then goes on to state how Paris has taken steps to exercise more sustainable lighting practices. There is a consistent use of both precise word choice and well-chosen turns of phrase the natural magnificence of stars in a dark sky is definite, our world consumed by unnatural, vapid lighting, the affecting power of an untainted night sky.
By doing this, Russell is able to concentrate more on the humour and the drama of the play. Almost all the back-story included in the first scene is reiterated — and expanded upon — in the second scene, when Hamlet appears for the first time.
Also he states that natural darkness can be a source of solitude. The writer seems to have a sense of the form that analysis should take, but this response demonstrates ineffective analysis overall. This shows a definite sense of inevitability and fate- showing that someone can see what is going to happen, but it cannot be avoided because it was meant to happen, suggesting that the characters are isolated and fate will run its course, and those watching from the bridge cannot intercept.
Perhaps if the scene was designed to give palpable hints towards the personality of a central character — such as Hamlet himself — then such an argument could be made.
He gives two specific, well-known examples of these species; these discussed the species of North American birds that migrate at night and the sea turtles that lay their eggs on the shore at night.
Overall, the writer has demonstrated partial understanding of the source text.At the beginning of the play, the unspoken stage directions that introduce the scene serve as foreshadowing for the rest of the play, as it hints at the personalities of Mrs.
Hale and Mrs. Peters while drawing attention to the evidence that will later become important in our understanding of Minnie Wright's psychology.
Study Help Essay Questions Bookmark this page Show how the first act forewarns the audience of almost all the forthcoming events in the rest of the drama. 4. At least one character in each play prefers an imaginary view of life to a realistic viewpoint. With this in mind, discuss the life-view of Torvald Helmer.
Hamlet, Act 2 Scene 2 Essay - In this scene we see two new characters, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, childhood friends of Hamlets. They have been sent by the king,Claudius, to help discover why Hamlet's behaviour has changed, and to find out whether he is actually mad.
in order to set the stage for the rest of the play to come. The opening scene of “A View from the Bridge” contains a lot of clues and preparations for what is to come in the rest of the play.
By just reading the title, the reader can tell a lot about what events will occur. The opening stage directions suggest the theme of the play before any characters are introduced, which is very significant.
An important milestone in play, the capacity for make-believe play - also known as fantasy play - occurs at around two and a half or three years of age. Before that, children are more oriented to the real world: their own bodies, simple household objects like pots, pans, and wooden spoons, and simple toys like dolls, trucks, and balls.
This is why act 3 scene 1 is definitely the turning point to the play as it seriously changed the rest of the play. I have analysed the language used by Shakespeare and how he used language to change the mood of the audience and show that act 3 scene 1 is the turning point in Romeo and Juliet.Download