Building an Argument Dennis G. Doing this creates the type of communication Carl R. Actually, Rogerian rhetoric can be considered as a peculiar version of the democratic debate.
On Becoming a Person: Smoking in Public Has to Be Permitted. A statement form makes a speaker defend his or her point, although the ultimate goal is to find a consensus. In reality, such an argument is aimed at finding common ground. The thesis should not be an attack on the opposition.
Rogerian approaches are particularly useful for emotionally charged, highly divisive issues. Instead of promoting the adversarial relationship that traditional or classical argument typically sets up between reader and writer, Rogerian argument assumes that if reader and writer can both find common ground about a problem, they are more likely to find a solution to that problem.
This idea might hold true with many animals, but when working with lions, this is particularly important; his life, he explained, depended on it.
The Rogerian method of arguing was named after the psychologist Carl Rogers, and he describes it as a kind of negotiation where both opposing parties compromise. If you choose a Rogerian argument, you need to we willing to somewhat shift your beliefs. We often find speakers and authors getting involved or facing a kind of aggression and challenge defending their point of view amongst people who disagree with them.
An introduction that gives a fair assessment of the opposition; a section detailing the viewpoints of the opposition and stating where you see merit in their views; the thesis statement that shows how you have taken the opposition into account but have still developed your own perspective; a section of support for your thesis that illustrates why it is valid; and a conclusion that illustrates why your position is beneficial to those on both sides of the argument.
One Cannot Censor the Information on the Web. Then the writer should explain how the consequences can vary if his position is adopted also keeping in mind what the reader believes in. What makes a Rogerian thesis different from a regular thesis is that it presented only after the writer has conceded that opposite viewpoints exist and that they have some merit.
Smoking in Public Has to Be Banned. But the statement should not be completely different. Rogerian Form of Arguments The purpose of an argument is to convince an undecided audience, but there are different ways of doing this.Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with.
The discussions that follow are meant to help you understand the reason for and the components of an argument in Rogerian style.
How To Write A Rogerian Essay. March 31, by admin Basic Essay Writing Tips. Rogerian argument is more of a negotiation method whereby shared goals are identified, but the opposing views are presented in an objective point to develop a common understanding.
The conclusion should not conclude by showing that the author thesis. As opposed to the traditional 5-paragraph essay, which has three main points as the body paragraphs, the Rogerian essay focuses on trying to work out the main arguments of each side.
The first body paragraph should focus on one side of the argument, and the second paragraph should focus on the other side. Successfully writing a thesis statement for a Rogerian argument means correct placement of the main idea in the body of the essay and writing the thesis in dispassionate language.
Doing this creates the type of communication Carl R. Rogers advocated. Essential Tips for Writing a Thesis Statement with the Method of Rogerian Argument Where in an Essay is the Rogerian Statement Written?
The thesis statement for a Rogerian argument does not come in the beginning like a typical essay. Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach agreement.
It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening.Download